Category: Uncategorized

Posted on

POV: Your AI Tool Broke Up With You and Left You With the Workflow

Writer.ai switching to a token-based model felt like a breakup I did not consent to.

No warning. No closure. Just “this is who I am now” and suddenly I am the one doing all the work in the relationship.

My team and I built real workflows around what it enabled. Speed. Consistency. The ability to get things done without turning every task into a five-step side quest.

Now I am over here trying to make Cursor do everything Writer used to do, and I have fully entered my Wile E. Coyote era.

Confident. Focused. Slightly unhinged.

Every solution looks like a tunnel. I commit. Full speed. Strategic. Visionary.

Painted brick wall.

At this point I am watching Cursor hallucinate and then questioning myself like “is this innovation or am I just tired?”

For example. I asked for a clean logo I could reuse in headers and footers. Not a rebrand. Not a design sprint. Just something functional.

Cursor gave me something.

Half decent. Slightly off. The kind of output where you think “okay… I can fix this.”

And then it followed up with “use a freeware design app to refine it.”

Now to be clear, I have a graphic designer. This is not a total loss.

But that was never the point.

The point was not to open a ticket and turn a 2-minute tweak into a tracked deliverable.

The point was speed.

I expected that I could make small adjustments and keep moving.

Apparently… that was too much.

And yes, I even tried to reverse-engineer my old prompts so I could recreate the magic.

Those prompts did not hit the same.

Which leads to the real lesson.

Tooling changes do not just impact output. They break invisible workflows your team depends on.

So here is the advice I am learning in real time while running into walls:

1. Reverse-engineer the behavior, not just the prompt.
It is not enough to copy the words you used before. You have to break down what the tool was actually doing behind the scenes. What context was it holding? What assumptions was it making? What did “good” look like in its output?
I tried recreating my prompts exactly and still got different results. Because the magic was never just the prompt. It was the system, the defaults, and the way the tool interpreted intent. If you do not map that, you are just recreating vibes and hoping for consistency.
2. Budget for chaos. Your productivity will dip. Your patience will dip faster.
3. Do not force one tool to do everything. Build a stack that actually supports how your team works.
4. Protect your quick wins. If everything has to go through a process, you are going to feel it immediately.

Cursor is evolving. We will figure it out.

But right now I am opening another tab, debating whether this is a “quick tweak” or a sprint task, and running straight into another painted wall.

Growth.

Posted on

Staying isn’t always about loyalty. Sometimes it’s survival.



People don’t stay in toxic workplaces because they want to—they staybecause remote roles are rare, benefits are tied to survival, and leaving feels risky.

The real difference? Leadership.

Not always the executives. Often, it’s the middle managers who make you feel seen, supported, and safe. I’ve had both: the leaders who broke trust—and the ones who understood the assignment.

The ones who said, “I’m giving you that raise because I don’t want to lose you.”
Those are the leaders you go the extra mile for—because they’ve gone the extra mile for you.

And yet, companies often replace employees without ever asking:
Why isn’t this person motivated?
Why don’t they want to work for me?
Leadership sets the tone. Culture starts at the top.

And if you’re an executive and your own employees comment on your posts—and you only respond to outsiders, what does that say?

If someone gives 10 years to your company and gets no goodbye, what message does that send?
It says: You’re replaceable.
It says: We don’t see you.

Retention is leadership performance.
Look at Google—consistently named a top place to work.
Why? Because they invest in leadership, development, and a culture where people feel valued.

Celebrate your people.
Support your people.
Because when they know you have their back, they thrive.

Posted on

Remote Work Diaries: Volume 598 – “Lunch Is a Boundary. Apparently.”



Working remotely with a global team means time is a flat circle. One team’s waking up, another’s clocking out, and I’m… still here. Half-awake, half-dressed, and fully booked.

Sleep? Rare. Family time? Scheduled like a dentist appointment. Lunch? I block it off on my calendar like it’s sacred. Naturally, someone sees that and thinks, “Perfect time for a meeting!”

Yesterday I was talking with some coworkers and we ended up laughing—because one of our teammates didn’t show up to a meeting. Just didn’t come. And when someone asked where she was?
“Oh, she’s at lunch.”
Lunch. A mythical, protected break. We were amazed. In awe. Honestly, we respected the move.

Meanwhile, I’m over here answering Teams messages with one hand and reheating food with the other, dodging meetings that could’ve been emails, and hiding my raccoon eyes behind blue light glasses—because I got LASIK 15 years ago and I refuse to let the Teams shadows win.

Yes, I work hard. But I’d also like to chew in peace. Just once.

If you’re juggling time zones, skipping meals, and trying to remember what daylight feels like—you’re not alone. Here’s to setting boundaries, reclaiming lunch, and maybe even taking a breath.